More than 250-thousand diplomatic cables and classified documents have been released by WikiLeaks, an organization which says it publishes “original source material alongside our news stories so readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth.” U.S. officials say the latest release of classified communications between the U.S. State Department and diplomatic sources could strain international affairs.

According to the New York Times, the White House says publication of the “stolen cables” is a “reckless and dangerous action.” Others have also condemned WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange for disclosing confidential and potentially harmful information.

With the Web’s ability to quickly disseminate news and information, is our national security endangered by WikiLeaks or other websites that publish classified material? Does it matter whether the website obtained the material legally?

Read more about the publications and let us know what you think about WikiLeaks:

Filed Under:
 

The Feds are saying Julian Assange could be charged with the Espionage Act. But that act is so loosely written that just about anyone could be charged under it for criminal activity.

It's an interesting story to follow.

 
 

Now Amazon.com has booted WikiLeaks off its web hosting service and WikiLeaks is being hosted by another ISP. There seems to be great fuss in the US, but not too much overseas, where they are censoring the information.

 
 

In answer to your questions, Yes, it matters whether the material was illegally obtained and Yes, our security is threatened by the leaking of classified information. Governments must be able to engage in discussion (both internally and with other governments) in a confidential manner. Publishing details of discussion and negotiations that the negotiators have labeled as classified, whether someone feels that the classification is valid or not, must be punishable.

 
 

Governments of the United States have so often hidden wrong doing or failures or foul-ups behind claims of national security that it is hard any more to take such assertions seriously. Moreover, citizens have a predominating claim on the right to know what their officials are saying and doing in their names. It may be that there is in the documents yet to be posted some material the disclosure of which may prove dangerous. But so far, the administration seems to be crying wolf.

 
 

I thought you might find this interesting. Best- Mac

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/opinion/04stone.html?_r=1&nl=todayshea...

 
 

I hate WikiLeaks' action, but it doesn't appear that the documents were obtained through criminal means. If that turns out to be true, I don't see how the U.S. can keep someone from publishing. It's more an embarrassment for the U.S. than anything else.

 
 

Hello: This editorial in the NYT relates to your post. Best- Mac http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/opinion/04stone.html?_r=1&nl=todayshea...

 
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <blockquote> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <object> <param> <embed> <p> <small> <hr> <br> <u> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5>
  • You can use Markdown syntax to format and style the text. Also see Markdown Extra for tables, footnotes, and more.

More information about formatting options